Legal Opinion
Holman v. Industrial Stamping & Manufacturing Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1955No. Calendar 46,617PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.
The Industrial Stamping & Manufacturing Company, a division of Vinco Corporation,, hereinafter referred to as defendant company, engages in the business of stamping and plating automobile parts. ' Until September, 1954, its operations were conducted in Detroit, Michigan, at 2 locations, hereinafter referred to as the Epworth plant (stamping) and the Beaufait plant (plating). The employees of both plants were unionized and had collective bargaining contracts with defendant company, the Epworth union being Local 174, UAW-CIO and the Beaufait union being AEL Metal Polishers, Local 1.
On September…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Citizens for Common Sense in Government v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lowe v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 705Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Duffy v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Baker v. Shopmen's Local Union No. 755Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.