Rowan v. Sussdorff
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, William H. Sussdorff, from an order of the Supreme -Court, madej at the Kings County Trial Term and, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 13th day of March, 19.11. . '
1Opinion of the Court
Jenks, P. J.:
This is an appeal from an order ajt Trial Term that vacates an order for the dismissal of the complaint, the judgment thereon, and restores the cause to the calendar for trial. The plaintiff complains that the, defendant came upon his lands and killed his dog. The defendant answers that he killed the dog in protection of himself and of his household. The learned Tria]; Term in its opinion says that the nonsuit rested entirely upon failure to prove the value of the dog, and that it thinks.it erred in the exclusion of certain testimony as to value. Brit we think the learned court.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Durant Land Improvement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Van Rensselaer v. JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Mullaly v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Renner & Bussard v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Haight v. HolleyNew York Supreme Court · 1829
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Central Westchester Humane Society, Inc. v. HilleboeNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Travis v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 2013