State Ex Rel. Williams v. SUPERIOR CT IN & FOR CTY OF PIMA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
This special action presents the question of whether the offense of disturbing the peace is compromisable under A.R.S. § 13-1591, as amended. The respondent court, on appeal from a City Court conviction, concluded that it did. Since such ruling is not reviewable by appeal to this court, State v. Spitz, 15 Ariz.App. 120, 486 P.2d 800 (1971), appellate intervention by way of special action is appropriate.
The misdemeanor compromise statute, with certain exceptions which we need not consider here, provides for dismissal of the prosecution when a defendant is accused of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Schafer v. FentonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. City Court of City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- State v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- State v. SpitzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MirandaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1981