Legal Opinion

In re Cady

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1940No. 4343PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the examiner in denying all the claims in appellant’s application — 6 and 9 — upon the ground that they did not patentably distinguish from the issue of an interference to which applicant was a party. Claim 6 is illustrative and follows:

6. A valve stem comprising a body of molded material, a nipple projecting from one end of said stem, a thread on the exposed end of said nipple and a flange of deformable material carried by said nipple and disposed between the end of said material…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pearce v. MulfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re BicknellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  2. Application of NelsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  3. Application of Headley Townsend BackhouseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  4. In Re SchwartzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  5. Application of NelsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API