Legal Opinion

State v. Nieto

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 17, 2003No. 51259-5-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

79 P.3d 473 (2003)

119 Wash.App. 157

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Isaias Robert NIETO, aka Ike Nieto, Appellant.

No. 51259-5-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

November 17, 2003.

Isaias Nieto, pro se.

Richard Alan Hanson, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Kimberly Anne Thulin, Eric John Richey, Bellingham, WA, for Respondent.

AGID, J.

Isaias Nieto appeals his conviction of third degree rape of a child. He claims that the trial court erred by admitting the victim's written statement as substantive evidence and finding that Nieto confessed. We hold the victim's statement lacked sufficient…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. State v. CastellanosWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. CastellanosWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BencivengaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BencivengaWashington Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. OttonWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. State v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State v. McComasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API