Legal Opinion
Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2017No. 15-55550; 15-55977; 15-55951PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA, Circuit Judge,
with whom Judge CALLAHAN concurs. Judge IKUTA concurs except as to Sections Ill.C.l.iii.b and III.C.Liv:
In 1939 Germany, as part of the “Aryan-ization” of the property of German Jews, Lilly Neubauer (“Lilly”) 1 was forced to “sell” a painting by Camille Pissarro (the “Painting”), a French Impressionist, to Jackob Scheidwimmer (“Scheidwimmer”), a Berlin art dealer. We use quotation marks around “sell” to distinguish the act from a true sale because Scheidwimmer had been appointed to appraise the Painting by the Nazi government, had refused to allow Lilly to take the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Mercury Interactive Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Twitter, Inc. v. Ken PaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Adamson v. Port of BellinghamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Stevens v. Jiffy Lube Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Balkrishna Setty v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.