Legal Opinion
(BK) Jerome v. Barnack
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 31, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00073Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CONNIE JEROME, et al., No. 2:19-cv-0073 MCE DB 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER AND CERTIFICATION OF FACTS 14 ROBERT SCOTT BARNACK, an Individual, Julia 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 On August 20, 2021, this matter came before the undersigned for an order to show cause 19 hearing, with respect to the repeated failure of defense counsel Julia Young and judgment debtor 20 Robert Scott Barnack to comply with the orders of this court. Attorney Matthew Powell appeared 21 via Zoom on behalf of plaintiffs. Although…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Donovan v. MazzolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Craig John Maisonville, and James M. Dombroski v. F2 America, Inc. F2 International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Baker v. LimberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.