Guzman v. Alvares
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HolderJanice M. Holder, J.
in which WILLIAM M. BARKER, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and CORNELIA A. CLARK, JJ., joined.
We granted review in this divorce action to determine whether the parties entered into a bigamous marriage and, if so, whether the doctrine of marriage by estop-pel applies. The wife also contests the trial court’s computation of child support. We conclude that the parties entered into a void, bigamous marriage to which the doctrine of marriage by estoppel does not apply. We, however, are unable to ascertain from the record the basis for the trial court’s computation of…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Bass v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Marcus v. MarcusTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Townsend v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Gordon v. PollardTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Layhew v. DixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. v. EppersonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Freda Boyce and Marvell Boyce v. LPP Mortgage LTDCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
- United States v. AliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Becker v. JuddDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
- In Re ESTATE OF Raymond L. SMALLMANTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.