Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Reese

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1952No. 5649PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE CONCINI, Justice.

Respondent Reese was injured 'by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment on August 20, 1949, while in the employ of the Inland Trading & Construction Company, a copartnership. He filed a claim with the Industrial Commission under the Workmen’s Compensation Act and was awarded $1114.42 as compensation, and $12,855.65 was paid out to others for “accident benefits” on respondent’s behalf. That on or before April 15, 1951, Reese filed his election of remedy to sue a third party and take any deficiency he might suffer from the commission. On or about…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. PressleyArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Moseley v. Lily Ice Cream Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Industrial Commission v. NevelleArizona Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Bernice M. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Morgan v. HaysArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Kirkpatrick v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Ruth v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Hornback v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API