Legal Opinion

State v. Bright

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 8, 1996No. 2540PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Randy Bright (Bright), appeals his conviction for criminal conspiracy, second-degree arson, and burning personal property to defraud an insurer. The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of two previous fire losses, for which Bright made insurance claims and was paid. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

I. FACTS

On November 15, 1992, Bright’s home was destroyed by fire. At the time the home burned, it was insured for $175,400 and its contents for $131,550. As a result of the fire, Bright received payment from Nationwide Insurance Company in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. TynerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. MajorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. SweatCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. GlennCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API