Legal Opinion · Dissent

Uscardio Vascular, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 23, 2008No. 1D07-3811Published

1DissentBenton, J.

At issue in the present case is nothing more or less than whether “base rent”— unambiguously defined as such for purposes of the leases in question — is subject to the excise tax levied by section 212.031, Florida Statutes. For the three tax years in dispute, the statute provided (as it still provides):

[A] tax is levied in an amount equal to 6 percent of and on the total rent ... charged for ... real property [like appellant’s] ... The total rent ... shall include base rent....

§ 212.031(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2001). The present case poses a straightforward question of statutory construction,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boudreau v. M & H FOOD CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API