Legal Opinion

Matter of Meizlish

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1976No. Docket 23715, 25145PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Maher, P. J.

Judge William C. Hague twice found defendant, an attorney, in contempt during proceedings before Judge Hague in Recorder’s Court, Traffic and Ordinance Division. Defendant appeals both convictions.

I

After Randolph Wedler, Robert Hart and James Khatami were charged with disturbing the peace, they appeared before Traffic Court Referee George T. Ryan. The referee recommended convictions for all three, with sentences of 5 days in Detroit House of Corrections and fines of $100. The three defendants then appeared before Judge Hague. When Hart told Judge Hague that he wanted to "appeal” the referee’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re DodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. State v. BoydWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Smith v. Common Pleas CourtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Baugh v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  5. Baugh v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API