Legal Opinion

Claus v. Claus

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1986No. 20021PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this divorce action, plaintiff appeals from that portion of the decree dealing with the distribution of the parties’ marital estate and the award of temporary alimony to defendant. We affirm.

The parties were married four and one-half years before they separated. No children were born of the marriage. Both had been married before and had brought several pieces of real property into the marriage. The trial court awarded plaintiff all the assets of his two corporations, real property owned by those corporations, and a rental unit acquired by the parties during the marriage. Defendant was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. FletcherUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Argyle v. ArgyleUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Higley v. HigleyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Delatore v. DelatoreUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Workman v. WorkmanUtah Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stephens v. StephensUtah Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API