Potash v. Molik
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton Ward, J.
This proceeding is brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination by the respondent as City Clerk of the City of Buffalo.
The respondent has determined that a certain referendum petition protesting a local law and petitioning for a referendum thereon is invalid for want of a sufficient number of valid signatures, and for this reason did not comply with applicable law. Respondent has so certified to the Common Council of the City *2of Buffalo as provided for by section 16 of the City Home Rule Law.
The Common Council of the City of Buffalo enacted a local law…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Morris v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Millar v. TollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Graham v. City Clerk of OgdensburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- La Clair v. CaswellNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.