Legal Opinion
Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 20, 2009No. 08-16233PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge McKEOWN; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT.
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
We are again faced with the question whether a state statutory scheme requiring growers to fund generic advertising for promotion of an agricultural product violates the First Amendment. Here, we consider the case of compelled assessments on California table grape1 growers, levied through the California Table Grape Commission (the “Commission”). Specifically, we address whether this generic advertising scheme is the government’s own speech and is thereby exempt from a First Amendment compelled speech challenge,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carey v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pleasant Grove City v. SummumSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Keller v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brickman v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Delano Farms Co. v. Cal. Table Grape CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- (PS) Greek v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Delano Farms Co. v. Cal. Table Grape Com.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.