Legal Opinion

Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 17, 2016No. Case No.: 3:08-CV-0318-CAB (BLM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo, United States District Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of their class claim for failure to provide meal breaks. [Doc. No. 335.] Plaintiffs contend that Penske did not have a meal break policy compliant with California law thereby entitling the class to a finding of liability as a matter of law. The motion has been fully briefed and the Court finds it suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Having…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Cole v. CRST, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ontiveros v. Safelite Fulfillment, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
  2. Fuller v. TWC Administration, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API