State v. Bussard
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
These consolidated appeals present a troubling and recurrent question — whether persons accused of crimes should be convicted upon evidence relating to other crimes not charged. The question is raised here by Roy Bussard and David Mason. They were tried jointly in the district court of Kootenai County, where a jury found them guilty of committing two burglaries and related thefts. On appeal they assert that the trial judge erroneously admitted evidence connecting them with other burglaries. They further contend that certain physical evidence should have been suppressed because…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Arvle Edgar MedlinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. FairchildIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. HoffmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. HagedornIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. HockerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.