Legal Opinion

Flores Flores v. Barr

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 7, 2019No. 17-3646Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-3646 Flores Flores v. Barr BIA McManus, IJ A206 223 272 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nadarjh Ramsameachire v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Jian Xing Huang v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Mu Xiang Lin v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Marta Brigida Melgar De Torres v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, and the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Wei Sun v. Jefferson B. Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API