Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Lane

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1917No. 7377PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

WEST, .

This is an action by plaintiff in error, who will hereafter be styled “plaintiff,” against D. G.. Lane, county treasurer Le Flore county, defendant in error, who will hereinafter be stsled “defendant," commenced in the district court of Le Flore county, to recover alleged illegal, excessive taxes paid to the defendant under duress and protest. The petition of plaintiff alleged that the taxable property of Le Flore county was in excess of $12.-000,000, and that the county excise board made a levy for current expenses for said county the same being upon estimate furnish.ed by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olson v. Logan County BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Board of Education v. Board of Com'rs of Creek Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Board of Com'rs of Carter County v. School Dist. 19Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. School Dist. No. 7 v. Board of Com'rs of Creek CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Schaff, Rec. v. Borum, Co. Treas.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API