Jansik v. Studstill & Hollenbeck, Inc.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, J.:
A bill in equity was filed to have declared an equitable attachment against certain real estate. The bill alleges that the land sought to be attached was listed for sale by the appellant owner with appellee, a real estate broker. Appellee broker procured a prospective buyer, who, later, for the purpose of evading payment of the broker’s commission, fraudulently conspired with the owner to enter into an agreement of sale; that the title is yet in the seller. The seller and buyer are both made parties defendant and are both alleged to be nonresidents of Florida. All defendants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gentry-Futch Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Moss v. SperrySupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- King v. WellsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- The Amphitrite Corp. v. City of Fort LauderdaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
3Cited by3 opinions
- Manning v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Ganaway v. HendersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Cuba Aeropostal Agency, Inc. v. KaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962