State v. Caldwell
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Judge.
A jury found Barry Caldwell guilty of grand theft. Caldwell moved for a new trial, contending that he had located a previously unavailable witness who could offer new evidence to support Caldwell’s defense. The district court granted the motion. The state appeals, asserting that Caldwell’s newly discovered evidence does not meet the requirements for granting a new trial. We affirm.
The record reveals the following facts. In October, 1984, Hazel Tolman moved from Idaho to Utah. Barry Caldwell helped her move some of her personal property to Utah. Tolman left other items of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. DrapeauIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. OlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. PalinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. AmesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SlanakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State v. ArledgeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. HayesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- Michlitsch v. MeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. CaldwellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.