Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 13, 2008No. 20061010-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MeHUGH, Judge:

T1 Joe Arthur Martinez Jr. appeals his conviction and the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Martinez argues that the trial court erred when it denied his suppression motion because police officers effectuated a traffic stop of a vehicle in which Martinez was a passenger without reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal behavior and, therefore, violated his constitutional rights under the federal and Utah constitutions. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 Because of the fact-dependent nature of search and seizure inquiries, we review the relevant facts in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Van DykeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  2. State v. GoddardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. State v. HinmonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API