Legal Opinion

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. United States Department of Homeland Security

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 23, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00239Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE : ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, et al. : v. : Civil Action No. DKC 18-0239 : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Presently pending and ready for resolution is the Motion to Stay, or in the Alternative, to Confine Discovery to the Administrative Record filed by Defendants United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), former acting DHS Secretary Elaine Costanzo Duke, and former DHS Secretary Kristjen Nielsen. (ECF No. 73). The issues have been briefed,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  5. Saget v. TrumpDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API