Legal Opinion

Halpern v. Martinelli

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1957Published

1Opinion of the CourtJohn E. Cone, J.

Plaintiffs move for an injunction pendente lite enjoining the defendants from picketing their place of business, from forcing, intimidating or requiring the plaintiffs to recognize the defendants as the collective bargaining agent of plaintiffs’ employees and from interfering directly or indirectly in their business.

Plaintiffs are engaged in the business of refinishing custom furniture and employ three workers. Defendant union consists of an approximate membership of more than 5,000 members *795who are employed in the manufacture of furniture frames and allied products.

Plaintiffs allege that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goodwins, Inc. v. HagedornNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. May's Furs & Ready-To-Wear, Inc. v. BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Wood v. O'GradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Palermo v. MottoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API