Legal Opinion

Chaulsett v. City of Fort Lauderdale

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 15, 1973No. 71-744PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

272 So.2d 163 (1973)

Mary K. CHAULSETT, Appellant,

v.

The CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a Florida Municipal Corporation, and the Hartford Insurance Group, a Connecticut Corporation, Appellees.

No. 71-744.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 15, 1973.

T. Paul Hodge and Ray Sandstrom, of Sandstrom & Hodge, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ronald E. Soloman, of Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

MAGER, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the complaint of Mary K. Chaulsett, plaintiff, for failure to give proper written notice to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rabinowitz v. Town of Bay Harbor IslandsSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. City of Sarasota v. ColbertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  4. City of Jacksonville v. HinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Brooks v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rinker Materials Corp. v. City of Boynton BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Southern Steel Co. v. HOBBS CONST. & DEV., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API