Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Fidelity National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1932No. 23585. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

National banks are prohibited from making usurious contracts. The pertinent statutes read as follows:

“Any association may take, receive, reserve, and charge on any loan or discount made, or upon any note, bill of exchange, or other evidences of debt, interest at the rate allowed by the laws of the State, Territory, or District where the bank is located, and no more, except that where by the laws of any State a different .rate is limited for banks of issue organized under State laws, the rate so limited shall be allowed for associations organized or existing in any such State under this Title.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. First Nat. Bank of Rapid CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Baker v. Lynchburg National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Commercial Nat. BankDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1947
  2. Lloyd v. Fidelity Nat. Bank of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API