Beulah Marble Co. v. Dixon
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from the District Court of Pueblo County.
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.
The disposition of what might be not inaptly termed an interlocutory question will dispose of this appeal and render it unnecessary to consider, except by the barest reference, any of the fifty-one errors which the appellant has assigned. Dixon sued the Beulah Marble Company for the value of his services as an attorney, which he laid at $3,000. The answer did not controvert the employment, the performance, nor the nonpayment of the fees. It denied that the services were worth the sum claimed, but conceded them to be worth $500. No question of tender is presented. The case appears to have been…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Winter v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell v. MurrayColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
- Winter v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Sholes v. NorrisColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
- Bell v. MurrayColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
- Sholes v. NorrisColorado Court of Appeals · 1900