Legal Opinion
Randall McFadden v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 15, 1987No. 86-3396PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
Randall McFadden appeals a judgment of sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1982).
McFadden entered a conditional guilty plea to certain counts of a multi-count indictment. Three issues are raised on appeal. 1 We consider these issues in turn.
A
McFadden and his counsel contend that McFadden did not possess the requisite mental state to violate 18 U.S.C. § 844(f) (1982 and Supp. Ill 1985), as charged in Count II of the indictment. Our review of this issue is plenary. 2
Section 844(f) provides, in relevant part: Whoever maliciously damages…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Maggio v. FulfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rios v. Enterprise Ass'n Steamfitters, Local No. 638Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Charles Joseph Hogan, A/K/A Hal Winter Michael TrupeiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Albert Lee Purcell, Shon PurcellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Francisca Rosa VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Theodore Robert Bundy v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.