Fansler v. Honeycutt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
Defendant Charles Leonard Honeycutt appeals from orders requiring him to refrain from stalking and harassing Plaintiffs Kenny Ray Fansler and Cassandra M. Fansler. On appeal, Defendant contends that (1) the trial court’s conclusions that Defendant was stalking the Plaintiffs lacked adequate evidentiary support; (2) the trial court’s orders failed to contain sufficiently specific findings of fact and separately stated conclusions of law as required by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 52; and (3) Plaintiffs’ complaints were not adequately verified as required by N.C. Gen. Stat. §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re T.R.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Matter of GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Martin v. Martin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- In re S.D.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Albemarle Child Support Enforcement Agency v. EasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re D.F.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014