Legal Opinion

Claim of Caiazza v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Mercure, J.P.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 29, 2001, which established the rate of claimant’s workers’ compensation benefit payments.

Claimant worked for a self-insured employer from 1972 until his retirement in February 2001. From 1974 to 1985, he was a machinist in the employer’s metal fabricating department where he was exposed to carcinogenic chemicals and mineral oils. Following a diagnosis of skin cancer, claimant filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits in 1990, but continued to work. On April 24, 2000, claimant was diagnosed with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Marino v. K.L.M. Royal Dutch AirlinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Claim of Watford v. Continental Can Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Claim of Homrighouse v. Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Coakley v. General Motors Corp. Harrison Radiator DivisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Yarleque v. Sally Lou, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Claim of Renz v. Home Depot USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API