Daniels v. Moser
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The trial court entered judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict in favor of plaintiff. The narrow question presented by plaintiff’s appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s determination that defendant was negligent. Under settled principles we view the evidence, and the inferences legitimately to be drawn therefrom, in the light most favorable to plaintiff.
Plaintiff was seated on a small load of hay in defendant’s truck as defendant drove it through a cemetery gate. An archway sign over the gate brushed plaintiff to the ground. He suffered severe injuries.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Granflaten v. RohdeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Ulrikson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Utah Idaho Sugar Co. v. TemmeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Blomberg v. TrupukkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Maher v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cuppy v. BunchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Henry Carlson Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Stoner v. EggersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- Ecklund v. BarrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Ries v. Daffin CorporationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.