Legal Opinion

Baltimore Transit Co. v. Prinz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 22, 1958No. [No. 134, September Term, 1957.]PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

The two appeals here involved arise out of actions for alleged negligence brought by Ruby Mae Prinz and Floy Kirkpatrick, plaintiffs below and. appellees here, against The Baltimore Transit Company, defendant below and appellant in this Court. A rear-end collision occurred between an automobile driven by the appellee, Prinz, in which the appellee, Kirkpatrick, was riding as a passenger, and a bus of the appellant. The cases were tried together before a jury; and, at the conclusion of the appellees’ evidence, the trial judge refused to grant a motion for a directed verdict offered by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kantor v. AshCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Brehm v. LorenzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  3. Holler v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. Washington, Colesville & Ashton Turnpike Co. v. CaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  5. York Motor Express Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Leizear v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Lehmann v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. Fire Insurance Salvage CorpsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Bernardi v. RoedelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  5. Yellow Cab Co. v. BondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API