Legal Opinion

Starr v. Doctors Hosp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 11, 1983No. 81-869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed an action because of a party's failure to file a motion for substitution, within six months after a suggestion of death upon the record, as provided for by ARCP 25 (a). We affirm.

The administrator of the Estate of Myrtis Hinote, Herbert W. Hinote, filed the original action from which this appeal arises, against the appellee, Doctors Hospital of Mobile, and other defendants, on December 6, 1979. The parties filed pleadings and engaged in discovery through September, 1981. On September 6, 1981, Herbert Hinote died.

The record…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Currie v. Great Central Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Harrell v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. State v. City Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  4. Piel v. DillardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Brookwood Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Henderson v. Briarcliff Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Calvert v. CASUALTY RECIPROCAL EXCH. INS.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Calvert v. CASUALTY RECIPROCAL EXCH. INS.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Moore v. GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API