Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dugger v. North Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1984No. 68322Published

1ConcurrenceBanke, Presiding Judge

I concur reluctantly in what strikes me an extremely harsh result, given that the claimant has undisputedly been disabled by exposure to asbestos during his 35 years of employment in the asbestos trade. The 30-day notice requirement set forth in OCGA § 34-9-80 is specifically made applicable by OCGA § 34-9-284 to claims for compensation for occupational disease. The last sentence of § 34-9-80 allows the board to waive the notice requirement provided “a reasonable excuse is made to the satisfaction of the board for not giving such notice and it is reasonably proved to the satisfaction of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Free v. Associated Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Patterson v. Employer's Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API