Legal Opinion

Whitescarver v. Waldo

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 8, 1920No. 9673PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action on promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Julian H. Moore, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller

The plaintiff in error, with A. M. Stevenson and L. C. Greenlee, was sued by defendant in error, Waldo, on a promissory note. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of Stevenson and Greenlee, upon the ground that the note in suit was signed by Stevenson and Greenlee upon the mistaken assumption that it was being executed pursuant to an agreement with The Ajax Wyoming Oil Com*357pany, of which all these parties were directors. Judgment was entered against plaintiff in error and he has brought the case here for review. He contends that under the well settled rules of law the dismissal of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hochmark v. RichlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Heckman v. ManningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beatty v. ReslerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Townsend v. HeathSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  3. Waldo v. WhitescarverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API