Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Prudential Lines, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 16, 1986No. 85 Civ. 830 (WCC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.

This case is a paradigm of the explosion of tort litigation that has caused a crisis in the liability insurance business — a prototypical exemplar of the virtually universal effort to obtain compensation for every injury or loss regardless of actual fault.

Plaintiff Charles G. Gorman (“Gorman”), a Chief Engineer on the tanker SAROULA owned by defendant Prudential Lines, Inc. (“Prudential”), has sued under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688 et seq. and general maritime law, claiming that he suffered coronary artery disease as a consequence of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,479 Samuel Mallis and Franklyn B. Kupferman, Cross-Appellants v. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Sentilles v. Inter-Caribbean Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Milos v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  5. Curry v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steven v. Sauer v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Shea v. IcelandairDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  3. Evans v. United Arab Shipping Co.(SAG)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  4. Sloan v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Carmody v. Pronav Ship Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API