Legal Opinion

Marradi v. New Pete's, L.L.C.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 8, 2020No. 1:17-cv-12588Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) 265 FRANKLIN STREET ASSOCIATES, ) LLC, ) ) Cross-Claim Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 17-cv-12588-LTS ) NEW PETE’S, LLC, ) ) Cross-Claim Defendant. ) ) ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS (DOC. NO. 63) January 8, 2020 SOROKIN, J. Previously, the Court ruled that “265 Franklin may not seek full indemnification for legal costs and fees related to this matter; rather, it may only seek indemnification for costs related to allegations that implicate the conduct and operation of New Pete’s business.” Doc. No. 59 at 4 (internal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Hutchinson Ex Rel. Julien v. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. HUTCHINSON EX REL. JULIEN v. PatrickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API