Paladino v. Brovitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: The record, even when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, reveals that the parties failed to agree upon the amount of a brokerage commission payable to plaintiff. Plaintiff’s claim that the parties agreed that he would be paid a commission of $12,500 or 6% of base rents for a 10-year period is no more than an agreement to agree on the amount of commission at some time in the future (see, Cobble Hill Nursing Home v Henry & Warren Corp., 74 NY2d 475, cert…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. SchumacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cobble Hill Nursing Home, Inc. v. Henry & Warren Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Kennedy v. HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parkway Group, Ltd. v. Modell's Sporting GoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Phil Kriegel Associates, Inc. v. M. Lahm Knitting Mill, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992