Legal Opinion

Paladino v. Brovitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: The record, even when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, reveals that the parties failed to agree upon the amount of a brokerage commission payable to plaintiff. Plaintiff’s claim that the parties agreed that he would be paid a commission of $12,500 or 6% of base rents for a 10-year period is no more than an agreement to agree on the amount of commission at some time in the future (see, Cobble Hill Nursing Home v Henry & Warren Corp., 74 NY2d 475, cert…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. SchumacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Cobble Hill Nursing Home, Inc. v. Henry & Warren Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Kennedy v. HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parkway Group, Ltd. v. Modell's Sporting GoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Phil Kriegel Associates, Inc. v. M. Lahm Knitting Mill, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API