Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Costello

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 22, 1957No. 24470_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge.

The United States of America appeals from a decision, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 145 F. Supp. 892, dismissing without prejudice its action for the denaturalization of defendant, Frank Costello, alleging fraud and illegality in its procurement in 1925. In taking this action during the course of the trial, Judge Palmieri found the government’s case permeated with the fruit of illegal wire taps and held that it would not be feasible to attempt to separate the legal and illegal evidence so as possibly to save the case. Accordingly in the exercise of discretion and over plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. James J. MatlesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. Salvatore BenantiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. United States v. Gaetano Lucchese, Also Known as Thomas Luckese, Also Known as Thomas Lucase, Also Known as Thomas Arra, Also Known as Thomas LucheseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. United States v. CostelloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Suarez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  3. United States v. Charles v. GrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. United States v. HoffaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API