Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 20, 1959No. 18887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

Plaintiffs in error, Industrial Commission and Fred H. Austin, will be referred to as the Commission and employer, respectively. Defendants in error will be referred to as the claimants. The husband and father of the claimants, out of whose death this claim arose, will be referred to as the decedent.

Claimants sought death benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act on account of the death of the decedent arising out of and in the course of his employment with employer. After hearing, the Industrial Commission found that the employer was not subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Act because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Comerford v. CarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  3. Maley v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Monfort of Colorado v. HussonColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Vargo v. Colorado Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Colorado Counties, Inc. v. DavisColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Puffer Mercantile Co. v. ArellanoColorado Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API