Legal Opinion

Dominik Karnas, et al., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated v. Mark Cuban, et al.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 27, 2026No. 1:22-cv-22538Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 22-cv-22538-ALTMAN/Reid DOMINIK KARNAS, et al., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MARK CUBAN, et al., Defendants. _______________________________________/ ORDER In December 2025, we granted the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (the “MTD”) [ECF No. 155], finding that we lacked personal jurisdiction over the Defendants.1 See Motion to Dismiss Order (the “Order”) [ECF No. 363] at 29. Our Plaintiffs have since filed two motions. In the first, a Motion to Reopen [ECF No. 364], the Plaintiffs ask…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. William S. Manuel v. Convergys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Robinson v. Giarmarco & Bill, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Nichols v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API