Legal Opinion

Pozeynot v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1880 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam 1

Opinion,

Helen Pozeynot (Claimant) challenges the decision of the referee that her refusal to work overtime constituted willful misconduct under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5,1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e). The reasonableness of both the employer’s request and the employe’s refusal must be considered in determining whether Claimant’s conduct is disqualifying. Wilson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 37 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 3, 388 A.2d 796 (1978). The employer requested this additional work to insure…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waltz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. SKB Photo/Graphics, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Sampson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Waltz v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API