Legal Opinion

Sauter v. One Lytle Place, Unpublished Decision (3-18-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 2005No. C-040266UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

{¶ 1} The plaintiffs-appellants, Anna B. Sauter and her husband, Karl Sauter, appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendantappellee, One Lytle Place, on their claims for personal injuries and loss of consortium. The claims arose as a result of Anna Sauter slipping on the floor of a kitchenette located near a swimming pool at the One Lytle Place luxury apartment complex. Because genuine issues of material fact exist concerning whether One Lytle Place had sufficient superior knowledge of the floor's slipperiness to trigger a duty to warn, we…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Turner v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ray v. Ramada Inn NorthOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Perko v. Healthcare Servs. Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API