Legal Opinion

Waters of White Lake, Inc. v. Fricke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1950Published

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

Charles B. Fricke is the sole defendant in the action which is for an injunction restraining him from using the waters of a lake. Plaintiff owns portions of the land under water. A temporary injunction was granted without notice. The defendant, his son, Raymond Fricke, and the son’s wife, Ethel Fricke, were each adjudged guilty of contempt for violation of the injunction.

The notice of appeal properly states in the title the name of Charles Fricke, but adds “ et. al.” after it, still, however, using *629the singular “ defendant ”. In the body of the notice it is stated that the “ defendants ”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Sullivan v. Judah & WeedNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  3. Wolff v. HubertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Vose v. ConklingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. People v. SchoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API