Legal Opinion

Melendez v. Melendez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject respondent’s contention that the determination changing physical custody of the parties’ daughter from respondent to petitioner lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see, White v White, 209 AD2d 949, lv dismissed 85 NY2d 924; Fox v Fox, 177 AD2d 209, 211-212). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that petitioner met his burden of showing that the change of custody is in the child’s best interests (see, Matter of Ammann v Ammann, 209 AD2d 1032; see also, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171-174). (Appeal from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Fox v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Ammann v. AmmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. White v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schattinger v. SchattingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API