Bowden v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Georgia
Presumptions. Attorneys’ fees. Before Judge Richard H. Clark. Dekalb superior court. August term, 1887. The facts of this case and the questions of law involved are so similar to those in the case just preceding between the same parties, that the report of that ease is referred to as the report of this.
Read the full summary
Presumptions. Attorneys’ fees. Before Judge Richard H. Clark. Dekalb superior court. August term, 1887. The facts of this case and the questions of law involved are so similar to those in the case just preceding between the same parties, that the report of that ease is referred to as the report of this. Only the following additional statement is deemed necessary: The ft. fa. in this case was levied, on October 7, 1884, on 3,000 pounds of seed-cotton, more or less, in the field. It was in favor of “ J. W. Kirkpatrick, agent Wan do Phosphate Company ” vs. W. T. Bowden and A. C. Bowden. The bond…
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
This case contains the same facts and points as are *206contained in the case just decided between the same parties, and the decision in that case rules the points in this, with two exceptions. When the ji.fa. was offered in this case, it was objected to upon the additional ground that it was headed “ Georgia, Eulton county,” and recited the judgment as rendered in the justice’s court of the 536th district, without stating the county. The plaintiff in the suit on the bond alleged that he was formerly the constable of the 536th district, of Dekalb county. The court admitted the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Carroll v. Cash MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Griffin v. CromartieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Bentley v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- McConnell v. HulseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915