Legal Opinion

Przychodzki v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1993No. 2099 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, Judge.

Jean E. Przychodzki (claimant) petitions for review of the September 4, 1992 order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversing the referee’s grant of benefits, because claimant did not present substantial evidence that her alleged work-related psychiatric injury was other than a subjective reaction to normal working conditions.

Claimant worked for Wyeth Laboratories (employer) from 1956 until January 8, 1990. Initially, she worked as a packager; in 1961, she became a capsule machine operator; on January 2, 1990, she became a stock attendant. Claimant changed jobs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. City of Scranton v. City of ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Calabris v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Department of Public Welfare v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Philadelphia Elec. v. Wcab (Miller)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API