Legal Opinion

Rogers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 3, 1999No. 99-01324PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Acting Chief Judge.

Fredrick Rogers seeks certiorari review of a trial court order compelling an attorney to provide an investigative statement to the state attorney concerning Mr. Rogers’ communications to that attorney. The trial court entered the order on the State’s oral motion at an ex parte hearing. Such an order may be reviewed by certio-rari. See State v. Rabin, 495 So.2d 257 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986); Corry v. Meggs, 498 So.2d 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We quash the order because the trial court failed to give Mr. Rogers notice and an opportunity to be heard before it decided that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. RabinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. State v. RutherfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Corry v. MeggsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. State v. CaballeroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES v. JacksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API