Legal Opinion

Andrew v. West Point State Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 6, 1934No. 42282PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

-The facts in the case are stipulated. At the time of the transaction between Hannahs and the West Point State Bank, such bank was a going concern. Prior to these transactions, the West Point Bank Ead a correspondent known in the record as the “Burlington Bank.” The Burlington Bank had become the creditor of the bank of West Point to the amount of $11,000 and was holding collateral therefor, to the amount of $33,000. Such was the relation between the two banks when the Burlington Bank went into the hands of a receiver. The necessity of meeting its obligation to the Burlington Bank, and of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Andrew v. Iowa State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bates v. First Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API