Salomon Ledezma-Cosino v. Loretta E. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge CLIFTON.
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) determined that Petitioner Salomon Ledezma-Cosino was not eligible for cancellation of removal or voluntary departure because, under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(1), as a “habitual drunkard” — that is, a person with chronic alcoholism — he inherently lacked good moral character. He now petitions for review, contending that the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution forbid the Government from making such an irrational classification as to moral character…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Maria Martinez-Rosas v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Palmore v. SidotiSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Henri Calderon-Rodriguez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Sameh Hussein v. Robin BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Hendrick v. CaldwellDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2017
- Horowitz v. Allied Marine, IncDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
- Salomon Ledezma-Cosino v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017